Reviews
E-mail

Puss in Boots

 

When you’re in the jungle, it’s not the cackle and cries of the beasts you listen for, but the quiet moments that suggest they’re actually watching.

 

Likewise, when you’re a middle-aged dude in a theater full of over-caffeinated, excitable kids, you pay attention when they shut up for a second. You notice when they lean forward to hear a cartoon cat snarl: “The egg betrayed me!” You scribble down in your notebook when they gasp as the cat says, “"You made the cat angry - you no want to make the cat angry!"

 

Let’s face it: Puss in Boots isn’t meant for someone who remembers when Tom and Jerry were the height of cartoon animation. Imagine a five-year old today giggling hysterically as a poorly drawn cat and mouse run through the reoccurring rolling landscape of a cartoon from the 1970s.

 

In many ways my childhood doesn’t seem as vivid and richly detailed as Puss in Boots.
The only way I could watch the movie, then, was as a cultural anthropologist, a stranger in a strange land, with my ears open for any suggestion that the little critters are discontent.

 

A little research: Puss in Boots is a prequel to the Shrek franchise, where the cat apparently appears as a supporting character. Like Shrek, Puss takes place in a fairy tale land where familiar characters like Humpty Dumpty and Jack and the Beanstalk rub shoulders. This means that children –or adults – vaguely familiar with the characters from Mother Goose will feel at home.


I don’t remember Shrek being this richly textured and detailed. It’s possible to get lost in the pattern of tapestries, the folds of clothes and the million other details that remind you that you are at least 100 years old and were once simple enough to be engrossed by the Super Friends and Scooby Doo …

 

I suppose there is a plot, but really Puss in Boots shouldn’t require character development, conflicts, and resolutions. Kids today should just be thrilled to watch this cat do somersaults or dance on a tight rope. Why, when I was a kid I used to play with rusty spring, empty spools of thread and discarded bottle caps…

 

But, I digress. There is a plot: Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas) was boyhood friends with Humpty Dumpty (Zach Galifianakis). The pair lived in an orphanage and bonded over daydreams of finding the duck that lays the golden eggs, of theJack and the Beanstalk fame. Always mischievous and adventurous, they start a life of crime early, stealing treats from the nearby villagers.

 

Puss isn’t as driven by his criminal urges as his eggy friend and the two split when Humpty betrays his friend’s trust. Forced into a burglary, the cat and egg are pursued by the local constable and Puss is chased from the village. A fugitive, the cat strikes out on his own as a desperado, searching for a caper that will allow him to pay his debt to his town.

 

Fast forward to the present day. Puss hears that Jack’s magic beans have reappeared and decides to steal them. Unfortunately, he’s not the only one with that idea, and he meets up with fellow criminal Kitty Softpaw (Salma Hayek)just as the beans are within eyeshot. Come to find out, Kitty and Puss’ old friend humpty are in cahoots to steal the beans, too.

 

Eventually the three team up to not only steal the beans, but also to capture the duck that lays the golden eggs.


I imagine kids can follow this plot, even though adults like me will likely just sit agog as the cat rides a leaf as a sort of hang glider, giggle stupidly when he leaps from rooftop to rooftop, and wipe drool off our chin in the dark before we’re discovered as the dim wits we are. In a way, kids miss out on the delight adults can take in today’s animated films. They have seen the impossible so often that doesn’t strike them as being out of the ordinary at all. For them,Puss in Boots is only another in a long string of films aimed at extracting delight.

 

For cranky adults like me, it is proof that middle age is a rip off.

 
E-mail

The Ides of March


Most political dramas are pretty upbeat. Politics are dirty, they say, but there’s also good in our system. These sorts of movies invariably focus on earnest, heroic underdogs who foil CIA assassinations or bring down corrupt governors. The evil of the system is located in individuals who can be contained and not the system itself.   

The Ides of March is nothing at all like this.

When we meet Stephen (Ryan Gosling), a campaign-press secretary during a very tough presidential primary, he seems like a good American boy. A rising star in the Democratic Party, Stephen knows how to control a room, bark orders, and interpret arcane polling information. More importantly, however, he still has stars in his eyes, still seems to believe his candidate Governor Morris (George Clooney) is the man to lead the country.    

Driven by this belief in his own goodness – and by extension Morris’ goodness – Stephen tells his boss that he’ll “do or say anything if I believe in it, but I have to believe in the cause.” So while he is an expert political pragmatist, crafting sound bytes that play to his audience and understanding how the media will present its information, he is also the innocent idealist who will rescue the system from collapse.

His boss, Paul Zara (Philip Seymour Hoffman), has been a political hit man for decades. If Morris is a Dr. Jekyll for liberal idealism in the film – expounding all sorts of leftist fantasies like green energy initiatives and student loan forgiveness – Paul is his rough talking Hyde. Chain smoking his way from one meeting after another, Paul seems to carry the weight of his battles on his back.     

The campaign seems to be in high gear as Morris enters Ohio. Up in the polls and hitting his stride, Morris delivers one home run after another, speaking like a first-term Clinton to college students, hammering his opponent (Senator Pullman) in debates, his popularity rising steadily. The primary appears locked up when Paul meets with Sen. Thompson (Jeffrey Wright), who promises Morris enough delegates to send him over the top in return for a political appointment.

There’s a sort of mechanical precision to politics in The Ides of March . Although their goals are very different and there are many outward dissimilarities, Paul and Tom Duffy (Paul Giamatti), Pullman's campaign manager, are in many ways interchangeable gears in a machine. Although some variables exist – will Thomas throw his support to Morris or Pullman – most behaviors are predictable, mathematic, and ritualistic.

We accept a certain level of cynical manipulation in politics, but The Ides of March brings us nearer to its absolute nihilism than any movie I can recall. Of course we know that the authentic-looking speeches are, in fact, highly rehearsed. We accept that our electoral process is actually a game between powerful individuals vying for ever more clout. We can accept all of this, but are we ready to embrace the truth that our democratic process is actually a very complex game played by a privileged few?

Stephen believes he is a master of this game, but he only understands its basic rules. When he begins seeing a much younger intern name Molly (Evan Rachel Wood), he calculates the possible outcomes ahead of time and decides the damage would be minimal. The political is personal because people are themselves only political game pieces, but eventually in order to understand its more elemental working, Stephen needs to lose.         

So when he finds himself in a position where he has been out gamed – forced into a position where he has no choice but to forfeit his queen – he’s exposed to a whole new system of mathematics. To regain control, he plans to put his new girlfriend into play in a way that can only be described as reprehensible. The endgame, which pits him against his former master, reveals not just the ugliness of politics (and the personal duplicability of those involved), but also the ways the political system dehumanizes all of us, whether master or slave.

Director George Clooney has created a taut, engrossing political thriller that brings us to places we would probably wish didn’t exist. By juxtaposing the left’s ideal candidate against the stark realities of the political world, he shows us how fabricated even our cynical daydreams are compared to the bitter realities.    

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 10 of 69

Want another opinion? Roger Ebert is one of my favorite reviewers and a personal hero.

Interested in hearing more? Download the eBook bound to change your life for $2.50 by clicking here!

Buy Now